Well, the process begun at the Minneapolis Heart Institute in late February came to a tentative conclusion yesterday: I had a stress echo performed and an evaluation presented to me.
First of all, I don't know if any of you have seen the new digs for the MHI. They're quite posh! There is a large, comfortable waiting area with Internet access and house phones. The staff admits there are still some bugs in terms of checking in patients (and that's true), but the place has been open for only six weeks. Dr. Maron has a new nurse, Connie (I forget her last name), and she is truly fab. I really enjoyed meeting her.
As far as the HCM goes, I am not obstructed. I figured this was the case going in, but given some of the contradictory information I've received over the years, it was good to have this finally confirmed. I did not get any of the "numbers" because, as will be demonstrated, my thoughts were elsewhere.
I am responding well to the amiodarone. Blood tests all came out normal, but I will, of course, continue to be monitored. I will also have pulmonary and vision tests in the near future. Overall I feel fine with the amio.
Now comes the fun part.
Dr. Maron said that the MHI has only been using MRI on HCM patients for a couple years. My MRI revealed significant areas of the ventricles that were non-reactive. It could be contributing to the AF or not; he couldn't hazard a guess. I am going back in six months for another MRI to, I imagine, see if there is any change. He wants to explore the possibility of installing an implantable ECG (http://www.medtronic.com/reveal/health.html) for a period of time to track my heart activity on a more intensive and regular basis.
I admit I am not quite sure what connection this has with the MRI findings; I think my partner and I were stuck on that and we didn't have the presence of mind to ask more questions. This is probably for the best, as I would probably obsess over this. I'm sure all will be made clearer when I go back in six months.
So, that's that. I was told back in November '03 that I was "medically interesting," so I guess it might be true.
-- T.
First of all, I don't know if any of you have seen the new digs for the MHI. They're quite posh! There is a large, comfortable waiting area with Internet access and house phones. The staff admits there are still some bugs in terms of checking in patients (and that's true), but the place has been open for only six weeks. Dr. Maron has a new nurse, Connie (I forget her last name), and she is truly fab. I really enjoyed meeting her.
As far as the HCM goes, I am not obstructed. I figured this was the case going in, but given some of the contradictory information I've received over the years, it was good to have this finally confirmed. I did not get any of the "numbers" because, as will be demonstrated, my thoughts were elsewhere.
I am responding well to the amiodarone. Blood tests all came out normal, but I will, of course, continue to be monitored. I will also have pulmonary and vision tests in the near future. Overall I feel fine with the amio.
Now comes the fun part.
Dr. Maron said that the MHI has only been using MRI on HCM patients for a couple years. My MRI revealed significant areas of the ventricles that were non-reactive. It could be contributing to the AF or not; he couldn't hazard a guess. I am going back in six months for another MRI to, I imagine, see if there is any change. He wants to explore the possibility of installing an implantable ECG (http://www.medtronic.com/reveal/health.html) for a period of time to track my heart activity on a more intensive and regular basis.
I admit I am not quite sure what connection this has with the MRI findings; I think my partner and I were stuck on that and we didn't have the presence of mind to ask more questions. This is probably for the best, as I would probably obsess over this. I'm sure all will be made clearer when I go back in six months.
So, that's that. I was told back in November '03 that I was "medically interesting," so I guess it might be true.
-- T.
Comment